Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Court Says Falana Lacks Locus Standi To Challenge Jumbo Pay Of Nigerian Legislators

Nigerian house of representatives

By Citizen Reports
The suit filed  by the prominent human rights activist, Mr Femi Falana challenging the powers of federal legislators to award  jumbo salaries and allowances to themselves was struck out yesterday by the Federal High Court on the ground that the plaintiff lacks the locus standi to maintain the suit.

The case was filed in August 2010 when there was a national uproar over the decision of the  National Assembly members to fix scandalous emoluments  for themselves.
In the substantive suit Mr Falana sought a declaratory relief to the effect that the members of the National Assembly are not entitled to receive any payment outside the salaries and allowances determined and fixed for them  by the Revenue 

Mobilisation and Fiscal Allocation Commission pursuant to Section 70 of the Constitution. In support of the originating summons Mr Falana  accused the legislators of usurping the constitutional powers of the RMFAC by taking advantage of passing Appropriation Bills into law  to make themselves the highest paid lawmakers in the world. 

While relying on the case of Fawehinmi V The President (2008)23 WRN 65 Mr Falana urged the court to appreciate that the anachronistic doctrine of locus standi was  discarded  by the Court of Appeal when it declared illegal and unconstitutional the payment of salaries of two ministers in dollars.

Mr. Falana also  submitted that his legal standing to promote good governance has been constitutionally guaranteed.
In opposing the  suit the Attorney-General of the Federation  and the National Assembly through  their counsel, Dr Alex Izion SAN  and Miss Grace Ekoh respectively, challenged the  locus standi of Mr Falana to question the salaries and allowances of the federal lawmakers. 

The defendants' lawyers described Mr Falana as a busy body who has not shown that his personal interest has been affected by the jumbo pay of the legislators. They therefore urged the trial court to dismiss the case on the authority of Abraham Adesanya V The President (1981) All NLR pg 1. Both the RMFAC and the Accountants who were joined in the action did not defend the suit.

In his judgment the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, Justice Ibrahim Auta held that Mr Falana lacked the locus stAndi to institute the case as he did  not prove that he had suffered any greater  injury than other Nigerian citizens  as a result of the action of the lawmakers. However, in striking out the suit the Judge said Mr Falana ought to have complained to the RMFAC and that if the body failed to act he could  then  sue to compel it to carry out its duty under the Constitution.  

In his reaction to the judgment Mr Falana said he would study the judgment and then decide whether to lodge a complaint with the RMAFC on the illegal jumbo pay or challenge the judgment on appeal since the learned Chief Judge of the Federal High Court conceded that it is the constitutional duty of the RMFAC to determine and fix the salaries and allowances of the legislators.

No comments:

Post a Comment